As seen through the eyes of a centrist senator from the Great Plains, Nelson shows how and why the spirit of bipartisanship declined and offers solutions that can restore the Senate to one of the world’s most important legislative bodies. With humor, insight, and firsthand details, Nelson makes the case that the “heart of the deal” is critical and describes how he focused on this during his time in the Senate. She said more as a statement instead of a question. Promises (Dean x Reader)The old you had been comfy swea. Nelson learned early on that the key to any negotiation at any level is genuine trust. In his story Sarrasine, Balzac, speaking of a castrato disguised as a woman, writes this sentence: It was Woman. Warnings- Implied character death, but it’s not sad per se Y/N Dean burst into the bunker door, Sam following behind and a long-haired blonde woman following them. His trusted centrist position gave him a unique perch from which to participate in some of the last great rounds of bipartisan cooperation, such as the “Gang of 14” that considered nominees for the federal bench-and passed over a young lawyer named Brett Kavanaugh for being too partisan. In his two terms as a Democratic senator from the red state of Nebraska, Nelson positioned himself as a moderate broker between his more liberal and conservative colleagues and became a frontline player in the most consequential fights of the Bush and Obama years. Death of the Senate is a clear-eyed look inside the Senate chamber and a brutally honest account of the current political reality. senator from Nebraska, is not going to let the institution destroy itself without a fight. Senate, and the disease has been spreading for some time. The Forum applauded the editor’s due diligence in handling this matter.Something is rotten in the U.S. Advice: The Forum asked for clarification from the editor regarding when in the publication cycle the author died and did the author see the final version of. Further, the Forum agreed that COIs, leading to bias in the work, would have been uncovered at the time of grant funding or peer review of the manuscript. It is questionable that the deceased author would benefit from any COI. There is still a non-financial aspect to potential COIs, which seems to be difficult to ascertain with certainty.įor the purposes of transparency, it would be useful for the editor to add a statement or footnote on the paper, including the date of death in relation to participation in authorship and a statement to the effect that to the best of their ability, the journal has determined there was no COI. It would be possible to ask his next of kin or executor to verify the conflict of interest (COI) statement to obtain a notarized statement, if that is required, if the editor is not comfortable taking an informal statement from the co-authors.įor the journal, there are three components: clarifying the COI statement, fulfilling the authorship criteria and signing the copyright agreement. Hence the Forum agreed that it seems reasonable that the author should remain on the byline. The Forum asked for clarification from the editor regarding when in the publication cycle the author died and did the author see the final version of the submitted and accepted article? The editor told the Forum that the author had seen the final accepted version.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |